We can now see how little and how much candidates spent on their campaigns during the November 2014 Municipal Election. Lisa Muri spends little, tops the polls, Kerry Morris spends a small fortune, crashes and burns, and everything in between. Obviously the 'secret' to being elected is not how much money you spend.
DNV Disclosures
CNV Disclosures
Sunday, March 01, 2015
Sunday, February 15, 2015
DNV Councillor moves to review pace of development
Councillor Muri's 'Pace of Development' memo and recommendations will be on the agenda of Monday night's council meeting. She will be seeking support from council on the recommendations in the memo which address the pace of congestion, development, and density in the District. During the November 2014 municipal election these issues seemed to be forefront on the minds of the electorate. Councillor Muri is also seeking support from the entire community.
dnvcouncil@dnv.org
Link to agenda addendum Monday, Feb.16th DNV Council meeting
Saturday, February 14, 2015
Voting for Busses
The good people of the Lower Mainland are about to be asked to approve – or not – a half percent increase in provincial sales tax to fund… well, that’s kind of vague.
Some describe it as a “Congestion Tax,” some as a “Transit Tax,” and others as a “Translink Tax.”
Any way you call it, it would mean a large chunk of money going to things that, in theory, would reduce road congestion and/or improve public transit.
Allegedly. And questions abound.
Question: How come a provincial government that can fund massive bridges for cars at the drop of a hat feels that money for transit has to be cajoled out of the populace by way of a referendum? If the Province supports public transit, why don’t they just increase the same tax on their own?
Question: If the Province doesn’t support public transit – and there’s a strong argument to be made – then will this referendum really change much? If it passes can we be confident that the senior levels of government will actually come up with the matching funds to make things happen?
Question: If enough people vote for this referendum, will the Province finally do something to fix the insane thing that is Translink? Will they finally allow the mayors to actually call the shots on transit?
Question: If the province won’t relinquish control of public transit, can we have any faith that the money collected by a new tax will go towards transit improvements, or should we expect it to wind up being used for yet more auto infrastructure?
Question: do our local MLAs support the “Yes” side, or the “No” side? As far as I know only Thornthwaite has come out and actually said that she’ll vote yes.
Question: What was the thinking behind the Province’s unilateral changes to the question drafted by the Mayors, and what does this tell us about what might happen if there’s a “Yes” vote? If the Province feels free to meddle in the question being asked, about money that will cost them nothing, why should we think they won’t continue to meddle in Translink’s affairs?
Question: What guarantee is there that the funds raised won’t be moved away from new services into refurbishing the thirty year old Skytrain system, or the four year old Compass system, or into some other money hole?
And finally, the elephant in the room: what happens of there’s a “No” vote? It would be immensely valuable if the Province would tell us that.
My reading is that the Province doesn’t give a sweet damn about public transit – they’ve got their helicopters and limos, so why would they care?
If the referendum gets a “Yes” vote Christy Clark will declare it a victory for her and her party.
If the referendum gets a “No” vote she’ll blame Translink and the Mayors.
Ultimately this referendum is not about funding transit, or even new bridges. It’s about the province once again trying deflect criticism of their botched, expensive, and largely failed efforts at managing Lower Mainland transit via their Translink proxy.
Some describe it as a “Congestion Tax,” some as a “Transit Tax,” and others as a “Translink Tax.”
Any way you call it, it would mean a large chunk of money going to things that, in theory, would reduce road congestion and/or improve public transit.
Allegedly. And questions abound.
Question: If the Province doesn’t support public transit – and there’s a strong argument to be made – then will this referendum really change much? If it passes can we be confident that the senior levels of government will actually come up with the matching funds to make things happen?
Question: If enough people vote for this referendum, will the Province finally do something to fix the insane thing that is Translink? Will they finally allow the mayors to actually call the shots on transit?
Question: If the province won’t relinquish control of public transit, can we have any faith that the money collected by a new tax will go towards transit improvements, or should we expect it to wind up being used for yet more auto infrastructure?
Question: do our local MLAs support the “Yes” side, or the “No” side? As far as I know only Thornthwaite has come out and actually said that she’ll vote yes.
Question: What was the thinking behind the Province’s unilateral changes to the question drafted by the Mayors, and what does this tell us about what might happen if there’s a “Yes” vote? If the Province feels free to meddle in the question being asked, about money that will cost them nothing, why should we think they won’t continue to meddle in Translink’s affairs?
Question: What guarantee is there that the funds raised won’t be moved away from new services into refurbishing the thirty year old Skytrain system, or the four year old Compass system, or into some other money hole?
And finally, the elephant in the room: what happens of there’s a “No” vote? It would be immensely valuable if the Province would tell us that.
My reading is that the Province doesn’t give a sweet damn about public transit – they’ve got their helicopters and limos, so why would they care?
If the referendum gets a “Yes” vote Christy Clark will declare it a victory for her and her party.
If the referendum gets a “No” vote she’ll blame Translink and the Mayors.
Ultimately this referendum is not about funding transit, or even new bridges. It’s about the province once again trying deflect criticism of their botched, expensive, and largely failed efforts at managing Lower Mainland transit via their Translink proxy.
Thursday, January 22, 2015
North Burnaby-Seymour Green Party Candidate Launches Campaign
Lynn Quarmby is launching her bid for a seat in the riding of North Burnaby-Seymour with a 'meet and greet' at Parkgate Community Centre on Thursday, January 22nd., at 5:30 PM . Green Party Leader Elizabeth May will also be in attendance.
http://lynnequarmby.ca/
Lynn Quarmby arrested on Burnaby Mountain
http://globalnews.ca/video/1732926/sfu-professor-lynn-quarmbys-political-future/
northshoregreens.ca
Thursday, January 01, 2015
Contest offered by developer for name
BOSA has launched a contest for the "Zellers/old Library' re-development on East 27th. in Lynn Valley. They are offering $2500 to the person whose entry they choose. To learn more visit http://www.lynnvalleylegacy.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)